PSYCHOLOGY OF LEADERSHIP
Subject code: BUS1300
Credit number: 03 credits
The prerequisite subjects: Basic Management
Main lecturer: PhD. Huynh Thanh Tu
Assistant lecturer: MBA. Nguyen Minh Thoai
Main Reference
Huynh Thanh Tu (2013), Psychology of leadership, Vietnam National University Press, Ho Chi Minh.
This book is written based on reference to the basics of other books about Psychology and Arts of Leadership and the real experience of the author.
Realistic data, illustrations and actual situations are collected from research data in the context of the world and Vietnam.
The content of this book is welcomed by generations of students with respect and excitement.
Other References
1. Le Anh Cuong, Nguyen Thi Le Huyen (2004), The art and the methods of leading in interprise, Social and Labor Publishing House.
2. Nguyen Huu Lam (2004), The art of Leadership, Vietnam Education Publishing House Limited Company.
3. Le Anh Cuong, Nguyen Kim Chi (2005), Business leaders, small tips to make a big success, Social and Labor Publishing House.
4. Joe Johnson, Team leadership, leading the team to success, Tre Publishing House.
5. Dale Carnegie, How to win friends and Influence People, Vietnam Culture and Information Publishing House
COURSE GOALS
After finishing this course, students can understand human nature and how to use and apply leadership skills (Style, Powers, Motivation, Psychology) as a means to achieve management goals.
By the end of this course, students' knowledge is evaluated according to the expected learning outcomes of the Psychology and Leadership Arts, which are in the expected learning outcomes of the Faculty of Business Administration.
COURSE DESRIPTION
On the basis of understanding human nature, the factors that affect human psychology, and psychological rules, learners can apply knowledge of the skills of the leader (Style, Power Motivation, Psychology) to the handling of real situations in order to achieve effective management.
Students can apply flexibly each of their leadership skills to resolve specific situations. Style Skills with 3 Modeling Styles: Domineering, Democracy, and Freedom. Power Skills with a model consisting of 3 powers: Position, Individual, and Political. Encouraging and motivating skills with the application of the Five-needs Theory of Maslow: Basic, Safe, Social, Respectful, and Expressive.
EXPECTED LEARNING OUTCOMES
CRITERIA
|
CODE
|
EXPECTED LEARNING OUTCOMES
|
CAPACITY
|
KNOWLEDGE
|
1.1.1.3.
|
Apply knowledge of Social Sciences and Humanities to solve organizational and management issues
|
|
1.1.2.1.
|
Understand basic knowledge of microeconomic theory, macroeconomic theory and management theory
|
|
1.1.3.1.
|
Understand knowledge and ability to think systematically in resolving organizational issues
|
|
1.1.3.3.
|
Understand the legal knowledge in business and professional ethics.
|
|
SKILLS
|
2.2.1.1.
|
Ability to identify and recognize problems in production and business
|
|
2.2.1.4.
|
Ability to manage an activity plan, such as a business plan
|
|
2.2.3.4.
|
Ability to analyze the matrix and choose a reasonable solution in the administration
|
|
2.2.4.4.
|
Be able to manage resources and time
|
|
2.2.5.3.
|
Be ethical, honesty and responsibility
|
|
2.2.5.4.
|
Having a professional attitude in problem solving
|
|
2.3.1.3.
|
Ability to communicate in writing and multimedia communication
|
|
2.3.1.5.
|
Ability to listen and critical thinking about the problem
|
|
2.3.2.4.
|
Ability to incorporate with others in group
|
|
attitudes
|
3.4.1.4.
|
Be aware of the current issues
|
|
3.4.1.5.
|
Be capable of developing a global perspective
|
|
3.4.2.2.
|
Ability to manage the conflict in the organization
|
|
3.4.2.3.
|
Ability to adapt in a multicultural environment
|
|
3.4.3.4.
|
Ability to use methods, tools for self-study
|
|
COURSE ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT TYPES
|
ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME
|
PERCENTAGE (%)
|
PROCESS ASSESSMENT (25%)
|
GROUP’S PRESENTATION (Students devide into group presentations, choosing their favorite characters to practice one of this leader's skills)
|
25%
|
Evaluate content preparation according to group’s division
|
1.1.1.3, 1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.3
|
30%
|
Evaluate skill of presentation in frond of class, skills in using the support tools to present the content of the subject.
|
1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.3.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4
|
30%
|
Evaluate the ability to interact directly between students with each other, with trainers to consolidate knowledge, receive new findings with the spirit of learning
|
2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 2.3.3.1, 2.4.1.4, 2.4.1.5, 3.4.2.2, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4.
|
20%
|
Assess students' ability to internalize their knowledge from the preparatory process, professional skills, communication skills, and personal attributes.
|
2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.3.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.1.5.
|
20%
|
MID-TERM ASSESSMENT (25%)
|
CRITICIZATION
(As one of the judges, each group will assign comments to othergroup’s presentations)
|
25%
|
Evaluate the ability to understand, present coherently, logical structure of an essay based on the following content: Theoretical Background, Problem, and Solutions
|
1.1.1.3, 1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.3
|
30%
|
Assess the ability to think systematically, make strong arguments, writte skills of a scientific report
|
1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.3.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4
|
30%
|
Assess the ability to accumulate, update new knowledge, internalize knowledge that has been exchanged, debated and criticized from the lectures.
|
2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 2.3.3.1, 2.4.1.4, 2.4.1.5, 3.4.2.2, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4.
|
25%
|
Assess presenting skill a scientific report in a suitable form, using references and quoting sources according to scientific standards.
|
2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.3.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.1.5.
|
15%
|
FINAL TEST (50%)
|
FINAL TEST
(Final test is conducted in 60 minutes. The test consists of three situations, including two problem – solution situations (3 marks/situation) and one persuasive situation (4 marks), aimed at examining the theory and theoretical ability of students to solve these situations in business administration)
|
50%
|
Assess the level of understanding of students, the ability to systematize and apply knowledge to present and explain a specific matter of the subject
|
1.1.1.3, 1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.3
|
50%
|
Assess the ability of thinking logically, ability of reasoning closely, ability of combining theory with reality to problem.
|
1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.3.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4
|
20%
|
Evaluate the creativity, recognize problems in human resource management from theory to reality.
|
2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 2.3.3.1, 2.4.1.4, 2.4.1.5, 3.4.2.2, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4.
|
20%
|
Evaluate the ability to present an academic writing, creativeness, and extensive use of knowledge to solve problems.
|
2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.1.5, 3.4.3.4.
|
10%
|
RUBRIC FOR ASSESSMENT: ON A SCALE OF 1-10
Score
Criteria
(Bloom scale)
|
<5
|
5-<7
|
7-<9
|
9-10
|
Content of subject
(70%)
|
Ability to remember and understand the knowledge.
|
Apply knowledge to solve problems.
Be listened to and criticized.
|
Apply knowledge and methods in a reasonable way.
analysis of the problem deeply.
|
Application of extensive knowledge, and right methods.
Analyse problem deeply and logically.
|
Style of writing, argument and form of presentation (30%)
|
Hard to understand
|
Easy to understand
|
Easy to understand and logically
|
Easy to understand, reasoning.
Beautiful presentation
|
Full Name:
|
*
|
|
Email:
|
*
|
|
Title:
|
*
|
|
Captcha:
|
(*)
|
RadEditor - HTML WYSIWYG Editor. MS Word-like content editing experience thanks to a rich set of formatting tools, dropdowns, dialogs, system modules and built-in spell-check.
RadEditor's components - toolbar, content area, modes and modules |
| | | |
Toolbar's wrapper | | | | | |
Content area wrapper | |
RadEditor's bottom area: Design, Html and Preview modes, Statistics module and resize handle. |
It contains RadEditor's Modes/views (HTML, Design and Preview), Statistics and Resizer
Editor Mode buttons | Statistics module | Editor resizer |
| |
|
|
RadEditor's Modules - special tools used to provide extra information such as Tag Inspector, Real Time HTML Viewer, Tag Properties and other. | |
| | | |
*
|
|
| |