MANAGEMENT
Course code: BUS1100
Course time: 03 credits
Course prerequisite:
Lecturer in charge: PhD. Pham The Tri
Supporting lecturers:
- MBA. Nguyen Thi Kim Oanh
- MBA. Nguyen Minh Châu
- MBA. Nguyen Thi Hong Gam
- MBA Nguyen Minh Thoai
- MBA. Nguyen Hoang Diem Huong
- MBA Hoang Doan Phuong Thao
Textbooks:
Pham The Tri (2016). Management. The Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam National University Publishing House.
The textbook is designed based on fundamental reference materials about scientific management and the long teaching experience of the course lecturers.
The figures, data, examples and real cases are collected from applied research into international and Vietnamese circumstances.
The textbook content is widely accepted by generations of students, with high esteem and excitement.
References:
1. Harold Koontz, Cyril Odonnell, Heinz Weihrich, (1992), Những vấn đề cốt yếu của quản lý, NXB Khoa học & Kỹ thuật, Hà Nội.
2. James H Donnelly,JR, James L.Gibson, John M.Ivancevich, (2003), Quản trị học căn bản, NXB Thống kê, Hà Nội.
3 .Nguyễn Thị Doan, Đỗ Minh Cương, Phương Kỳ Sơn, (1996), Các học thuyết quản lý, NXB Chính trị quốc gia, Hà Nội.
4. Mitokasu Aoki, (1993), Nghệ thuật quản lý kiểu Nhật Bản, NXB Sự thật, Hà Nội.
5. Robbins, S.P. & Coultar, M, (1996), Management, Prentice Hall International.
6. Antonio Kovacevic & Nukolas Majluf, (1993), Six Stages of IT Stategic Management, Sloan Management Review.
7. Paul D Harrison & Adrian Harell, (1993), Impact of Adversr Selection on Managers’Project Evaluation Decisions, Academy of Management.
8. Nguyễn Thị Doan, Đỗ Minh Cương, Phương Kỳ Sơn, (1996), Các học thuyết quản lý, NXB Chính trị quốc gia, Hà Nội.
COURSE GOALS:
The course provides students with fundamental knowledge of management in organizations, such as planning, decision making, organizing, leading, and controlling. Besides basic knowledge about functions of management, managerial skills are also provided to students in order to develop their analytical and problem solving ability to reach the core goals of efficiency and the relative stability of organizations.
To complete the course successfully, students are assessed based on the criteria of learning outcomes of the course, which are part of the major of business administration. The requirements ratings are based on a scale of 6 levels established by Benjamin S.Bloom (1956).
Course Description:
Management provides learners the management functions and skills to carry out all organizational activities by grouping all individuals’ activities toward the achievement of mutual goals.
The course includes the definitions of management; the roles and functions of managers; Values of management research; Impacts of internal and external organizational environment on effective decision making in organizations; Information regarded as input data to support decision making in organizations. The course also includes a detailed investigation of the four basic functions of management: planning and decision making, organizing, leading and motivating, and controlling.
Studying Management requires active studying activities, including discovering a student's own interpretation of management related research activity, listening in class, and interacting with teachers and classmates. Students are required to actively participate in all aspects of the assignment, such as group discussion of real business cases. Equal contribution from each group member in presentation and interaction to find a solution for a business problem is expected.
Management is a comprehensive course which suits all career pathways, not only for the business world but also non-business fields, not only for organizations but also for individuals, as the course objective is to aim for a successful result.
EXPECTED LEARNING OUTCOMES:
CRITERIA
|
CODE
|
DESCRIPTION OF COURSE GOALS
|
CAPACITY
|
KNOWLEDGE
|
1.1.1.3.
|
Apply knowledge of social sciences and humanities to solving of organizational and management problems
|
|
1.1.2.1.
|
Have basic knowledge of microeconomics, macroeconomics and management theories
|
|
1.1.3.1.
|
Have knowledge and ability to think systematically to solve organizational issues
|
|
1.1.3.3.
|
Have knowledge of business laws and demonstrate professional ethics.
|
|
SKILLS
|
2.2.1.1.
|
Have ability to identify and detect problems in production and business
|
|
2.2.1.4.
|
Have ability to manage a specific activity such as business plans
|
|
2.2.2.3.
|
Have ability to form ideas, plan and organize business activities
|
|
2.2.3.4.
|
Have ability to analyze the matrix and choose a reasonable management solution
|
|
2.2.4.4.
|
Have ability to manage time and other resources
|
|
2.2.5.3.
|
Demonstrate professional ethics, integrity and responsibility
|
|
2.2.5.4.
|
Demonstrate a professional attitude when solving a business problem
|
|
2.3.1.3.
|
Have ability to communicate in writing and multimedia
|
|
2.3.1.5.
|
Demonstrate critical listening and critical thinking
|
|
2.3.2.4.
|
Have ability to work and coordinate with others
|
|
attitudes
|
3.4.1.4.
|
Be aware of topical issues
|
|
3.4.1.5.
|
Have ability to develop a global perspective
|
|
3.4.2.2.
|
Have ability to manage conflicts in the organization
|
|
3.4.2.3.
|
Have ability to adapt in a multicultural work environment
|
|
3.4.3.4.
|
Have ability to use methods and tools for research
|
|
COURSE ASSESSMENT:
ASSESSMENT TYPES
|
ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME
|
PERCENTAGE (%)
|
ASSESSMENT OF THE PROCESS (20%)
|
GROUP PRESENTATION
Each group is assigned a topic related to the content of the course. Each group has 20 minutes to present, interact and give Q&A to the class.
|
20%
|
Assess the group’s preparation for their assigned presentations
|
1.1.1.3, 1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.3
|
30%
|
Assess the skills of speaking in public and using supporting tools to convey the content of their presentation effectively
|
1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.3.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4
|
30%
|
Assess the ability to interact with the instructor and classmates to broaden knowledge with a positive and collaborative attitude.
|
2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 2.3.3.1, 2.4.1.4, 2.4.1.5, 3.4.2.2, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4.
|
20%
|
Assess the ability to make use of knowledge earned from the combination of the preparation process, professional knowledge, communication skills and personal quality.
|
2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.3.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.1.5.
|
20%
|
MIDDLE ASSESSMENT (30%)
|
MIDTERM TEST
The midterm test uses management knowledge to solve some small new real problems.
|
30%
|
Assess the ability to understand, presentideas in a critical, logical and well-structured way. The structure of essay includes 3 parts: Literature review, the nature of problem and group’s suggestions
|
1.1.1.3, 1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.3
|
30%
|
Assess the critical thinkingability, ability to present convincing arguments, and to write a scientific report.
|
1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.3.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4
|
30%
|
Assess the ability to acquire knowledge, remain updated with global current events, apply knowledge earned from exchanging, discussing, critizing the content presented in the class.
|
2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 2.3.3.1, 2.4.1.4, 2.4.1.5, 3.4.2.2, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4.
|
25%
|
Assess the ability to present proper research, with good structures and references (if needed)
|
2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.3.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.1.5.
|
15%
|
FINAL ASSESSMENT (50%)
|
DISCIPLINE
60-minute essay includes multiple choice questions and a case study
|
50%
|
Assess the level of understanding and absorbing knowledge of students, the ability to systematize and use knowledge to present, explain and solve a specific problem within the scope of subject.
|
1.1.1.3, 1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.3
|
50%
|
Assess the ability to think logically, provide convincing arguments, apply theory into practice to solve and explain problems in a critical manner
|
1.1.3.1, 1.1.3.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.3.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4
|
20%
|
Assess creativeness and the ability to identify the problems in human resource managementin practice.
|
2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.2.4, 2.3.3.1, 2.4.1.4, 2.4.1.5, 3.4.2.2, 3.4.2.3, 3.4.3.4.
|
15%
|
Assess the ability to write an essay in an academic style using creative, in-depth knowledge to solve a problem.
|
2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.3, 2.3.1.5, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.1.5, 3.4.3.4.
|
5%
|
RUBRIC FOR ASSESSMENT: ON A SCALE OF 1-10
RUBRIC 1: GROUP PRESENTATION
|
9-10
|
7-8
|
6-7
|
5-6
|
< 5
|
Presentation content (50%)
|
Correct;
Sufficient;
Logical and succinct reasoning
New perspectives
|
Correct;
Sufficient;
Logical and succinct reasoning
|
Correct;
Sufficient
|
Correct
Insufficient
(sloppy content)
|
Incorrect
Insufficient
|
Q&A (30%)
|
Answers are:
Proper and to-the-point
Clear and coherent
Persuading
Leading to further thoughts or ideas
|
Answers are:
Proper and to-the-point
Clear and coherent
Persuading
|
Answers are:
Proper and to-the-point
Clear and coherent
|
Answers are:
Proper and to-the-point
|
Answers are not proper and to-the-point
|
Presentation delivery (20%)
|
Clear voice
Good facial expressions
Good eye contact making
Proper moves and gestures
Good introduction
Engaging
|
Not satisfy 1-2 criteria of score 10
|
Not satisfy 3 criteria of score 10
|
Not satisfy 4 criteria of score 10
|
Not satisfy more than 5 criteria of score 10
|
RUBRIC 2: CASE STUDY ESSAYS
|
9-10
|
7-8
|
6-7
|
5-6
|
< 5
|
Theory review (40%)
|
Able to choose relevant theories
Provide an adequate summary of the relevant theories
Provide reasons why they are relevant
Identify any differences between the theory content and the case given
|
Able to choose relevant theories
Provide an adequate summary of the relevant theories
Provide reasons why they are relevant
|
Able to choose relevant theories
Provide an adequate summary of the relevant theories
|
Able to choose relevant theories
|
Not able to choose relevant theories
Not able to provide a summary or explanation of the theories
|
Case application (60%)
|
Able to apply the theory to case evaluation
Able to provide solutons to the case
Provide compelling reasons for solutions chosen.
Identify problems that may arise after the case is solved.
|
Able to apply the theory to case evaluation
Able to provide solutons to the case
Provide compelling reasons for solutions chosen.
|
Able to apply the theory to case evaluation
Able to provide solutons to the case
|
Able to apply the theory to case evaluation
|
Improper application of theory
|
RUBRIC 3: FINAL TEST
|
9-10
|
7-8
|
6-7
|
5-6
|
< 5
|
Theory(Multiple choice questions)(80%)
|
Based on the number of correct answers
|
Based on the number of correct answers
|
Based on the number of correct answers
|
Based on the number of correct answers
|
Based on the number of correct answers
|
Small case study(20%)
|
Able to link to relevant theories
Provide reasonable solutions
Provide an in-depth analysis
Provide original solutions
Be able to predict/identify problems that may arise after the case.
|
Able to link to relevant theories
Provide reasonable solutions
Provide an in-depth analysis
Provide original solutions
|
Able to link to relevant theories
Provide reasonable solutions
Provide an in-depth analysis
|
Able to link to relevant theories
Provide reasonable solutions
|
Improper application of knowledge
Uncompelling solutions
|
Full Name:
|
*
|
|
Email:
|
*
|
|
Title:
|
*
|
|
Captcha:
|
(*)
|
RadEditor - HTML WYSIWYG Editor. MS Word-like content editing experience thanks to a rich set of formatting tools, dropdowns, dialogs, system modules and built-in spell-check.
RadEditor's components - toolbar, content area, modes and modules |
| | | |
Toolbar's wrapper | | | | | |
Content area wrapper | |
RadEditor's bottom area: Design, Html and Preview modes, Statistics module and resize handle. |
It contains RadEditor's Modes/views (HTML, Design and Preview), Statistics and Resizer
Editor Mode buttons | Statistics module | Editor resizer |
| |
|
|
RadEditor's Modules - special tools used to provide extra information such as Tag Inspector, Real Time HTML Viewer, Tag Properties and other. | |
| | | |
*
|
|
| |