ASSESSMENT TYPES

ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME

PERCENTAGE %

PROCESS (20%)

Field Trip Report

(Each group choose 1 organization to practice about teamwork. Then each group have to present your report about that field trip to the class)

40%

Written report:

-Content covers adequate information as requested

- Students have real hands-on experience

-Groups must evaluate each member’s role and contribution

- Have scientific presentation skill

-Have illustrations

2.2.3.3, 2.2.4.1, 2.2.4.4

1.1.1.3, 2.2.3.2, 2.2.3.3, 2.3.1.3.

50%

Presentation:

-Evaluating each group member role.

-Evaluating team time management skill.

-Sound and picture quality.

-Evaluating presentation skill, tool manipulation skills to show the teamwork process at real place.

-Evaluating teamwork spirit via interaction skill, cooperate with each other to grow knowledge and gain experiences to discover new things which can not gain through principles.

2.2.3.3, 2.2.4.1, 2.2.4.4

2.2.4.4.

2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.4, 2.3.1.5

1.1.3.1, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.2.1, 2.2.3.2, 2.2.5.3, 2.2.5.4, 2.3.2.1, 2.3.2.2, 2.3.2.3, 2.3.2.4, 3.4.1.4, 3.4.2.2, 3.4.2.3.

50%

40%

Group discussion exercise:

- Introduce the group.

- Design slogan for the product.

- The real situation on the island.

- Prioritize work handling.

Evaluating the ability to coordinate, organize group activities.

2.3.2.1, 2.3.2.2, 2.3.2.3, 2.3.2.4.

20%

Evaluating the role of the leader and how to resolve the conflicts while practicing.

2.2.3.2, 2.2.3.3, 2.2.5.4, 3.4.2.2.

20%

Evaluating the applicability of the theory - the method of group discussion into practice.

1.1.3.1, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.1.3, 3.4.1.4.

20%

Evaluating the ability to manage time.

2.2.4.4.

20%

Evaluating your presentation skills in front of the crowd.

2.3.1.4, 2.3.1.5.

20%

20%

Educational Minicamp:

- Lift the paper

- Funny artists

Evaluating the ability to coordinate, organize group activities.

2.3.2.1, 2.3.2.2, 2.3.2.3, 2.3.2.4.

70%

Evaluating the role of the leader and how to resolve the conflicts while practicing.

2.2.3.2, 2.2.3.3, 2.2.5.4, 3.4.2.2.

10%

Evaluating the applicability of the theory - the method of group discussion into practice.

1.1.3.1, 2.3.1.5, 2.3.1.3, 3.4.1.4.

10%

Evaluating the ability to manage time.

2.2.4.4.

10%

MID-TERM ASSESMENT (30%)

BUILDING THE MODEL

The groups will build the model as required by the instructor within a specified time. After that, each group will represent to talk about the idea, construction and meaning of that model.

30%

Evaluatingthe work assignment of the group.

2.2.3.3, 2.2.4.1, 2.2.4.4.

20%

Evaluating the ability to create the idea of building model.

1.1.1.3, 2.2.2.1, 3.4.1.4.

20%

Evaluating the building model of the group according to the actual standards.

1.1.1.3, 1.1.3.1, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4.

20%

Evaluating the public speaking skills and the skills to use the tools to help convey ideas to the listeners.

2.2.5.4, 2.3.1.4, 2.3.1.5.

20%

Evaluating the ability to manage time

2.2.4.4.

20%

FINALASSESSMENT (50%)

DISCIPLINE

The 60-minute test consists of 5 questions, both theoretical and the true / false questions.

50%

Measuring student knowledge, gain experience and systems skill to explain the subject issue.

Measuring thinking skill, argument skill, answering skill, combine theory and real experience to identify right side and wrong side of the subject issue

Measuring self-reflect skill to give example and solution for each situation

Measuring the ability of relating your own then present specific examples, solutions to each situation.

1.1.1.3, 1.1.3.1,2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.4, 2.2.3.3, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.3.

1.1.3.1, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.3.2, 2.2.3.3, 2.2.4.4, 2.2.5.4.

1.1.3.1, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.4.1, 2.2.5.3.

90%

Writing style, reasoning and presentation form.

1.1.1.3, 2.2.3.2, 2.2.3.3, 2.3.1.3.

10%

               Score

<5

5-7

8-9

10

Task delegation (20%)

Have a task delegation table;

Unclear task delegation;

All members are assigned with unequally important tasks

Have a task delegation table;

Clear task delegation;

Many members are assigned with unequally important tasks

Have a task delegation table;

Clear task delegation;

Some members are assigned with unequally important tasks

Have a task delegation table;

Clear task delegation;

All members are assigned with equally important tasks

Idea (20%)

Impractical;

Clear;

Lack of innovation;

Unattractive model design;

The written presentation on the paper has lots of crossed off content.

Practical;

Clear;

Lack of innovation;

Unattractive model design;

The written presentation on the paper is not eye-catching.

Practical;

Clear;

Lack of innovation;

Attractive model design;

The written presentation on the paper is eye-catching.

Practical;

Clear;

Innovative;

Attractive model design;

The written presentation on the paper is eye-catching.

Model (20%)

Not meeting the requirements for the model

Meeting the less important requirements for the model

Meeting the most important requirements for the model

Meeting all of the requirements for the model

Presentation (20%)

Not enticing

hesitant presentation;

Unable to use hand gestures;

There’s little cooperation between presenting members.

Unable to deliver all of the ideas

Not enticing;

Fluent;

Unable to use hand gestures;

There’s little cooperation between presenting members.

Unable to deliver all of the ideas

Enticing

Fluent;

Unable to use hand gestures;

There’s little cooperation between presenting members.

Able to deliver all of the ideas

Enticing

Fluent;

Able to use hand gestures

There’s cooperation between presenting members.

Able to deliver all of the ideas

Time (20%)

Exceed the allowed time by 20 seconds

Exceed the allowed time by 16 to 20 seconds

Exceed the allowed time by 6 to 15 seconds

On time;

Exceed the allowed  time by 1 to 5 seconds

Score

Criteria

(Bloom scale)

<5

5-<7

7-<9

9-10

Course knowledge

(90%)

Be able to apply the right knowledge to answer 2 questions

Ability for analysis not needed

Able to suggest 30% of the correct solutions for the case

Be able to apply the right knowledge to answer 3 questions

50% correct analysis on the focal point

Able to suggest 50% of the correct solutions for the case

Be able to apply the right knowledge to answer 4 questions

Correct and logical analysis

Able to suggest 50% of the correct solutions for the case

Be able to apply the right knowledge to answer all 5  questions

Correct and logical analysis

Able to suggest 90% of the correct solutions for the case

Writing, reasoning and presentation styles

(10%)

Incomprehensible writing

Comprehensible writing

Comprehensible and logical writing

Comprehensible writing

Careful reasoning

Good presentation

            Score

2 bonus points

3 bonus points

4 bonus points

5 bonus points

Word assignment (50%)

Not covering all of the required content;

Having had a practical study tour;

Unreasonable task delegation;

Unappealing presentation

No illustration

Covering all of the required content;

Having had a practical study tour;

Unreasonable task delegation;

Unappealing presentation

Few illustrations

Covering all of the required content;

Having had a practical study tour;

Clear and reasonable task delegation;

Unappealing presentation

Few illustrations

Covering all of the required content;

Having had a practical study tour;

Clear and reasonable task delegation;

Appealing presentation

Having enough illustrations

Presentation (50%)

Lack of task delegation in the presentation;

Exceeding the allowed time by over 21 seconds;

Bad sound and image qualities;

The speaker is not fluent and not able to observe the whole class;

Group members don’t cooperate well during the presentation.

Lack of task delegation in the presentation;

Exceeding the allowed time by 16 to 20 seconds;

Bad sound and image qualities;

The speaker is not fluent and not able to observe the whole class;

Group members  cooperate relatively well during the presentation.

There’s task delegation in the presentation;

Exceeding the allowed time by 6 to 15 seconds;

Good sound and image qualities;

The speaker is  fluent and able to observe the whole class;

Group members  cooperate well during the presentation.

There’s task delegation in the presentation;

On time or exceeding the allowed time by under 5 seconds;

Good sound and image qualities;

The speaker is  fluent and able to observe the whole class as well ashas good comments and appropriate hand gestures;

Group members  cooperate well during the presentation.